Definition of option backdating dating services in seattle
R.240.10b-5, which prohibit the use of manipulative and deceptive devices in connection with the purchase or sale of securities. Internal Revenue Code Section 422 Section 422 permits public companies to grant employees 'incentive stock options' (ISOs), allowing them to purchase the company's stock at a discount rate and free from taxes, unless and until the employee later sells any purchased shares. The company would be liable for any taxes it failed to withhold, as well as interest and other penalties, and executives' concomitant personal liability would depend on whether they committed these acts 'willfully' and in violation of the Code's criminal provisions. Internal Revenue Code Section 409A Section 409A requires companies that grant discounted stock options to treat them as a form of 'non-qualified deferred compensation' for taxation purposes. Any person who willfully violates ' any provision' of the Securities Act or the Exchange Act and ' any rule or regulation thereunder' commits a criminal offense, and could be subject to substantial fines as well as imprisonment. Two of these new regulations may give rise to liability, but only for backdating that occurred after August 29, 2002, the effective date of the amendments. Section 302 requires the principal executive and financial officers of publicly-traded corporations to certify each annual or quarterly report filed with the SEC. The officers also certify that they are responsible for establishing and maintaining internal corporate controls to ensure the proper disclosure of all material information. In addition, regardless of the GAAP accounting method the company used, the company must have recorded some sort of compensation expense for the discounted options. Additional Liabilities Under Sarbanes-Oxley When Congress and the SEC approved the Sarbanes-Oxley Act to amend the Exchange Act, they created additional financial regulations for publicly-owned corporations. Section 403 significantly shortened the time companies are permitted to wait before disclosing transactions involving management or principal stockholders, including option grants. This shortened time frame essentially removes the significant benefits of backdating because the limited volatility most stocks experience over the course of two days narrows the potential discount margin between the market price on the grant date and the strike price. This certification represents that the officers reviewed the company's financial data, and that it presents the financial condition of the company in all material respects. Certain 'performance-based' compensation payments are not counted toward the cap, including stock options that are granted with an exercise price equal to or greater than the FMV of the companies' shares on the date of the grant. Backdating of stock options is an example of an agency problem.It has emerged despite all the measures (i.e., new regulations and additional corporate governance mechanisms) aimed at addressing such problems?
There are three major areas of potential criminal liability for former executives involved in stock options backdating: securities fraud, tax fraud, and mail or wire fraud. Backdating only becomes illegal when executives fail to disclose the practice in financial reports, and fail to properly account for backdated options according to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and the relevant tax laws. Three possible violations of the Internal Revenue Code ('Code') could create criminal liability for backdating: (1) exceeding the compensation deduction limits of Section 162(m), (2) failing to qualify options under the rules that govern incentive stock options in Section 422, and (3) violating the provisions of Section 409A regulating deferred compensation. Whether executives will be criminally liable depends on whether they were consciously trying to cover up the practice of backdating. Like securities fraud, the criminal tax fraud statutes require an intent element. Securities Fraud The primary source of criminal liability for backdating are the federal securities acts, which regulate the sale of securities by publicly traded companies. In addition, any inadequate internal controls that led to the inaccurate reporting would constitute a separate violation. Intent Requirement For Securities Fraud Under the securities acts, a defendant must act 'willfully' or 'willfully and knowingly.' See 15 U. This intent requirement is important in options backdating cases to determine whether executives may face criminal, rather than merely civil, penalties. If an executive who participated in backdating certified the company's financial reports, and those reports did not disclose and account for backdating, then he would be liable for making a fraudulent certification. Though federal courts have inconsistently construed these terms, Where the statute requires the person acted 'willfully and knowingly,' however, some courts require the government to show not only that the defendant knew that backdating was wrongful (willfully), but also that it was unlawful (knowingly). Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m) Section 162(m) caps the annual deduction for compensation paid to top executives at one million dollars.
Search for definition of option backdating:
Criminal charges for backdating could include alleged violations of Section 17(a), 15 U. C.77q, which prohibits fraudulent interstate transactions, and Section 10(b), 15 U. This means a company must properly disclose and account for any backdating practices in its financial statements. Furthermore, the failure to record an expense for discounted options granted to employees might result in understated financials, which could in turn make other financial reports inaccurate, particularly net revenues.