Methods for validating requirements
Prototypes are very effectively done with fast sketches of storyboards and interfaces.
Prototypes in some situations are also used as official requirements.
One danger that we usually end up with is with least common denominator features.
Interface for any software product will either be human or machine.
It casts a broad net, determining various discreet possibilities.
Prioritization of such possibilities is vital to locate needles in haystack.
Many a times, people are not able to articulate a specific need in the abstract.
A workshop with two analysts is more effective than one in which on works as a facilitator and the other scribes the work together. When a migration project is not having enough documentation of the current system, reverse engineering will determine what system does?Like a good reporter, listening is a quality that assists an excellent analyst to gain better value through an interview as compared to an average analyst.The observation covers the study of users in its natural habitat.This paper describes the specification, validation and verification of system and software requirements using the SCR tabular method and tools.An example is presented to illustrate the SCR tabular notation, and an overview of each of the ten tools in the SCR toolset is presented.
Search for methods for validating requirements:
Popularly known as JAD or joint application design, these workshops can be efficient for gathering requirements.